On Being An Artist
Posted by Michelle under deep thoughts | Permalink | | Leave A Comment | 4 Comments
Sometimes I dream of being an artist in the time of patronage. Having some rich, and artistically savvy, someone pluck me from obscurity and take care of all the bills, keeping me fed, housed, and entertained while I create. Honestly, I’d be relatively cheap. I figure one of the Hiltons could support me in a very comfortable lifestyle for a full year on what Paris spends in one week of her tabloid-tastic lifestyle. But the era of patronage is long gone, and there were problems with it anyway.
When there is someone else paying all the bills there is a certain amount of kow-towing that goes with it. If you don’t want to be out on your ear you have to please your patron. You might get lucky and get an intelligent, well-educated patron with enough sense to let a good artist have his/her head, but you also might get stuck with a pig-headed idiot who thinks you exist only to aggrandize him/her. In this way the Industrial Revolution and the rise of the middle class was an incredible boon to artists everywhere. It allowed for artists to not be dependent on a single patron. The rising middle class now had leisure time and a few extra pennies in their pockets and so could afford and enjoy object d’art, literature, and music more than ever before. The machines of the Industrial Revolution also allowed an ease of reproduction (particularly useful for things like books, magazines, and sheet music) that made it easy for some types of artistic endeavor to travel where it was not possible before. Art was no longer the exclusive bailiwick of the rich and noble classes, and the artist was freed of the less savory aspects of patronage.
But all the artist gained, really, was a new patron, the masses. If you derive all of your support from one person, as long as that one person “gets” you your financial survival is assured. But when you depend on smaller contributions from individual members of the masses a lot of people need to “get” you. Some artists complain that this leads to a dumbing down of art in all its forms, especially since the consumer culture has grown to behemoth proportions in the last century. The artist becomes trapped in the publicity machine. You don’t want to destroy your art by pandering to the lowest common denominator, and yet there must be some amount of compromise if you are to fit as a proper cog in the publicity machine and thereby ensure you can buy groceries for the week and keep the lights on. Some artists even divide their work into distinct boxes in their minds – there is “commercial” work that will keep the bills paid, and there is the “real” art, the stuff that truly follows a personal artistic vision but may not be appreciated by the masses. One feeds the other. And just when you think this fractured existence will go on forever, there is another revolution on the horizon.
The internet has made it much easier for artists to reach audiences. Where before you might be constrained to where you could travel yourself or where you could send examples of your artwork, now you are much less limited by the shackles of geography. If you are the type of artist that has difficulty in satisfying the mainstream audience, you now have the chance to pick up your audience in small pockets, or even ones and twos throughout the globe.
So I ply my wares on the web (go to http://www.echelonpress.com/index.php?main_page=index&manufacturers_id=96! Buy my stories now!) and hope to build up enough patrons to keep the bills paid.

